vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $333.4M, roughly 1.9× PRA GROUP INC). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 0.3%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PRA GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-90.4M). Over the past eight quarters, PRA GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 13.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
CENX vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $4.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
