vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RH is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($883.8M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.4× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). RH runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs 0.3%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RH posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs 0.4%). RH produced more free cash flow last quarter ($83.0M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 9.4%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
CENX vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $738.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 43.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $101.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $123.7M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $-289.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $-297.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $4.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $-114.0M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $-251.5M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | -10.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
