vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $633.7M, roughly 1.8× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 0.3%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs 0.4%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
CENX vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
