vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Confluent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.8M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.7× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -25.2%, a 27.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 20.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 20.4%).
Confluent, Inc. is an American technology company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Confluent was founded by Jay Kreps, Jun Rao and Neha Narkhede on September 23, 2014, in order to commercialize an open-source streaming platform Apache Kafka, created by the same founders while working at LinkedIn in 2008 as a B2B infrastructure company. Confluent's products are the Confluent Cloud, Confluent Platform, Connectors, Apache Flink, Stream Governance and Confluent Hub.
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
CFLT vs CLMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.8M | $182.4M |
| Net Profit | $-79.2M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -31.5% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | -25.2% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.5% | 32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.0% | -9.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $182.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $314.8M | $193.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.5M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.3M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.1M | $138.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.2M | $161.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.2M | $119.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.0M | $92.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-79.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-66.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-67.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.1M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-89.9M | $3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 74.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.5% | 16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.3% | 20.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -31.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -37.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.1% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -25.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.3% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $1.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | $1.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $347.2M | $41.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $118.4M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $458.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.94× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $41.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $347.2M | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.5M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.6M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $278.6M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $386.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $322.6M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.3M | $48.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $116.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $109.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $105.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $95.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $961.2M | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $934.3M | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.9M | $79.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $458.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $460.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $376.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $420.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $371.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $302.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.25× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $42.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $60.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.2M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $7.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.37× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CFLT
| Confluent Cloud | $169.4M | 54% |
| Post Contract Customer Support | $93.8M | 30% |
| License | $38.4M | 12% |
| Services | $13.2M | 4% |
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
