vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $314.8M, roughly 1.7× Confluent, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs -25.2%, a 53.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Confluent, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.5% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Confluent, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.4% CAGR vs 3.8%).
Confluent, Inc. is an American technology company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Confluent was founded by Jay Kreps, Jun Rao and Neha Narkhede on September 23, 2014, in order to commercialize an open-source streaming platform Apache Kafka, created by the same founders while working at LinkedIn in 2008 as a B2B infrastructure company. Confluent's products are the Confluent Cloud, Confluent Platform, Connectors, Apache Flink, Stream Governance and Confluent Hub.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
CFLT vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.8M | $542.5M |
| Net Profit | $-79.2M | $151.2M |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -31.5% | 36.4% |
| Net Margin | -25.2% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.5% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.0% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $314.8M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.5M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.3M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.1M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.2M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.2M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.0M | $500.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.2M | $503.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-79.2M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-66.5M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-67.6M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.1M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.1M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-89.9M | $119.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-93.0M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 74.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -31.5% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.9% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.2% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.3% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.5% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -37.4% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.1% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.3% | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | -25.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.3% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.9% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.7% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.8% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $347.2M | $211.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $7.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $19.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.94× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $347.2M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.5M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.6M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $278.6M | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $386.0M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $322.6M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.3M | $126.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.4M | $133.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $961.2M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $934.3M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.9M | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $845.2M | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $19.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $42.1M | $258.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $60.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.8M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.2M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $294.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.0M | $176.1M |
| Q4 25 | $41.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.2M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.4% | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CFLT
| Confluent Cloud | $169.4M | 54% |
| Post Contract Customer Support | $93.8M | 30% |
| License | $38.4M | 12% |
| Services | $13.2M | 4% |
KIM
Segment breakdown not available.
