vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COGNEX CORP (CGNX) and JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COGNEX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($268.4M vs $127.6M, roughly 2.1× JBG SMITH Properties). COGNEX CORP runs the higher net margin — 19.3% vs -18.1%, a 37.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COGNEX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs 5.7%). Over the past eight quarters, COGNEX CORP's revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Cognex Corporation is an American manufacturer of machine vision systems, software and sensors. Cognex is headquartered in Natick, Massachusetts, USA with offices in more than 20 countries.
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
CGNX vs JBGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $268.4M | $127.6M |
| Net Profit | $51.7M | $-23.0M |
| Gross Margin | 71.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 19.3% | -18.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | 5.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 119.1% | 57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $268.4M | $127.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.3M | $127.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $276.9M | $123.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.1M | $126.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $229.7M | $130.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.7M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.3M | $135.3M |
| Q1 26 | $51.7M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $-28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | $-45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.3M | $-59.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $-24.4M |
| Q1 26 | 71.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | -47.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | -27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | -18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | -44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | -53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | -22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -24.3% |
| Q1 26 | 19.3% | -18.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | -35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | -15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | -37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | -45.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | -19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -18.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.14 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $237.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $237.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $262.9M | $75.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.9M | $64.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.3M | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.7M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.1M | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.1M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $176.6M | $163.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $42.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $241.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.5M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.3M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.8M | $23.8M |
| Q1 26 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CGNX
Segment breakdown not available.
JBGS
| Property rental | $105.9M | 83% |
| Third-party real estate services, including reimbursements | $17.2M | 13% |
| Other revenue | $4.5M | 4% |
