vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Community Healthcare Trust Inc (CHCT) and Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vera Bradley, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.3M vs $31.5M, roughly 2.0× Community Healthcare Trust Inc). Community Healthcare Trust Inc runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -19.9%, a 27.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Community Healthcare Trust Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -22.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Vera Bradley, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Vera Bradley Sales, LLC is an American luggage and handbag design company, founded by Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia R. Miller in 1982. As of 2019, its home office is in Fort Wayne, Indiana. The company was named after Baekgaard's mother. Its original luxury cotton bag product lines have expanded to include fashion and home accessories, office supplies, and patterned gifts. Many items have distinctive florals, paisleys, or geometric prints with complementary linings, as well as elonga...
CHCT vs VRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $31.5M | $62.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.5M | $-12.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -19.6% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -22.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.2% | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $62.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.1M | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $51.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.1M | $100.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3M | $70.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6M | $94.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $67.9M |
| Q1 26 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | $-8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -34.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.6% |
| Q1 26 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.6% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.2% | -64.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -47.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | -18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.9% | -12.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.50 | $-1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-1.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.6M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $421.3M | $128.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $243.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $44.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $734.0K | $55.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $532.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $530.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $496.0M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $486.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $473.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $421.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $429.4M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $426.8M | $140.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.8M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $461.3M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $476.0M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.2M | $242.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $497.8M | $245.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $990.8M | $243.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $987.3M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.3M | $267.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $985.1M | $306.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $992.6M | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.8M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $983.2M | $368.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.24× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.08× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.92× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-13.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $-14.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $-15.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 116.0% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.9% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 116.9% | -35.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.7% | -22.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 84.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.1% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.92× | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHCT
Segment breakdown not available.
VRA
| Bags | $23.9M | 38% |
| Indirect | $12.6M | 20% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.2M | 20% |
| Accessories | $7.2M | 12% |
| Home | $3.5M | 6% |
| Apparel Footwear | $1.8M | 3% |
| Other Products | $1.5M | 2% |
