vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TANDY LEATHER FACTORY INC (TLF) and Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vera Bradley, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.3M vs $22.3M, roughly 2.8× TANDY LEATHER FACTORY INC). TANDY LEATHER FACTORY INC runs the higher net margin — -4.2% vs -19.9%, a 15.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TANDY LEATHER FACTORY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -22.7%). TANDY LEATHER FACTORY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.0M vs $-4.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Vera Bradley, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 7.4%).
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. is an American specialty retailer and wholesale distributor of leather and leatherwork related products. It operates more than 100 stores worldwide. Originally part of the Tandy Corporation, Tandy Leather has gone through a series of acquisitions and mergers, eventually being sold to The Leather Factory in 2000. The Tandy Leather flagship store next to their corporate headquarters in Fort Worth, Texas also houses the Al and Ann Stohlman Leathercraft Museum.
Vera Bradley Sales, LLC is an American luggage and handbag design company, founded by Barbara Bradley Baekgaard and Patricia R. Miller in 1982. As of 2019, its home office is in Fort Wayne, Indiana. The company was named after Baekgaard's mother. Its original luxury cotton bag product lines have expanded to include fashion and home accessories, office supplies, and patterned gifts. Many items have distinctive florals, paisleys, or geometric prints with complementary linings, as well as elonga...
TLF vs VRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.3M | $62.3M |
| Net Profit | $-930.0K | $-12.4M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.8% | -19.6% |
| Net Margin | -4.2% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | -22.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -379.3% | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.3M | $62.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $51.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.5M | $70.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4M | $94.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $67.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.3M | $46.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-930.0K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-199.0K | $-33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.0K | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-132.0K | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.0K | $-8.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $525.0K | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 54.3% | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 44.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.3% | 45.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.0% | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | 37.2% |
| Q4 25 | -2.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.9% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | -34.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | -23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | -11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | -4.2% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.8% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.1% | -64.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.8% | -47.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | -18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | $-1.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.1M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.6M | $128.1M |
| Total Assets | $86.6M | $243.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.6M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1M | $44.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3M | $77.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $52.6M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.4M | $140.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.1M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.2M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.6M | $242.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.5M | $245.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.2M | $259.9M |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $243.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.5M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.5M | $267.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.9M | $306.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.9M | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $368.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.4M | $380.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.0M | $-4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | $-4.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.1% | -7.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-13.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-536.0K | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-535.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-514.0K | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $26.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-715.0K | $-15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.0K | $25.7M |
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.2% | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -41.0% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | -35.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | -22.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.7% | 55.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TLF
Segment breakdown not available.
VRA
| Bags | $23.9M | 38% |
| Indirect | $12.6M | 20% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.2M | 20% |
| Accessories | $7.2M | 12% |
| Home | $3.5M | 6% |
| Apparel Footwear | $1.8M | 3% |
| Other Products | $1.5M | 2% |
