vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp (CHMI) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.8M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.0× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -37.2%). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -15.2%).
Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp is a U.S.-headquartered real estate finance firm focused on acquiring, investing in and managing residential mortgage-related assets. Its core holdings include agency mortgage-backed securities, residential loans and mortgage servicing rights, operating primarily in the U.S. domestic housing finance market.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
CHMI vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.8M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 78.9% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 72.1% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | -37.2% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.3M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.0M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.4M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $784.0K | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 78.9% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.2% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.7% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 183.4% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.3% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 145.3% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.9% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | 72.1% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 223.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 171.8% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.0% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 229.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 175.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.7% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.29 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.49 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $54.9M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $146.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $236.0M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.62× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.9M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.4M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.5M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $146.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $236.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.1M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.9M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.6M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.3M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $234.5M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.0M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.1M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.0K | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.1M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.53× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
