vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of C.H. Robinson (CHRW) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
C.H. Robinson is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.9× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 3.5%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -6.5%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $302.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -5.8%).
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is an American transportation company that includes third-party logistics (3PL). The company offers freight transportation, transportation management, brokerage and warehousing. It offers truckload, less than truckload, air freight, intermodal, and ocean transportation.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
CHRW vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $136.3M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.5% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -8.7% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.3M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.3M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.3M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.12 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.34 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.26 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $160.9M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.9M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.8M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.9M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.7M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.2M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.80× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $305.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $302.4M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.7% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $894.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $305.4M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.4M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $227.1M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.5M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.9M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.1M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.4M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $302.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $269.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.24× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.69× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.11× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHRW
| North American Service Transportation NAST | $2.8B | 72% |
| Global Forwarding | $731.0M | 19% |
| Sourcing | $340.9M | 9% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
