vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Roper Technologies (ROP) and SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.1× SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 7.5%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs 11.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
ROP vs SGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $331.0M | $140.8M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.7% | 95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.87 | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | $140.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $398.5M | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $378.3M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.1M | $-33.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.3M | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.9M | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.1M | $106.1M |
| Q1 26 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.5% | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.2% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.7% | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.3% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.2% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.5% | 44.9% |
| Q1 26 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | $4.87 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.97 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.68 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.49 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.29 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.12 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $382.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $34.6B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $382.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $242.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $18.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.9B | $559.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $564.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $411.8M |
| Q1 26 | $34.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8B | $4.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 6.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $99.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $507.0M | $41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.2% | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $633.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $738.0M | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.5M | $408.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $186.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $722.2M | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.4M | $256.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.1M | $150.6M |
| Q1 26 | $507.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $360.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $149.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $240.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $122.1M |
| Q1 26 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.18× | 2.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
