vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. (CIVB) and FIVE STAR BANCORP (FSBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.3M vs $45.1M, roughly 1.0× FIVE STAR BANCORP). FIVE STAR BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs 31.7%, a 9.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, FIVE STAR BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (21.3% CAGR vs 11.3%).

Civista Bancshares, Inc. is a US-based bank holding company operating primarily across the Midwest region. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, mortgage, consumer and commercial lending products, as well as wealth management solutions, serving retail consumers, small and medium-sized local businesses and community client segments.

U.S. Bancorp is an American multinational banking institution headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota and incorporated in Delaware. It is the 5th-largest bank in the United States as of 2025. As the largest bank in the Midwestern United States, it is considered systemically important by the Financial Stability Board. It is the parent company of its primary operating entity, U.S. Bank National Association, which does business as U.S. Bank. The company provides banking, investment, mortgage, tr...

CIVB vs FSBC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CIVB
CIVB
1.0× larger
CIVB
$47.3M
$45.1M
FSBC
Higher net margin
FSBC
FSBC
9.6% more per $
FSBC
41.3%
31.7%
CIVB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FSBC
FSBC
Annualised
FSBC
21.3%
11.3%
CIVB

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Revenue
$47.3M
$45.1M
Net Profit
$15.0M
$18.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
31.7%
41.3%
Revenue YoY
Net Profit YoY
47.4%
42.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.72
$0.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
$47.3M
$45.1M
Q4 25
$46.3M
$43.5M
Q3 25
$44.2M
$41.3M
Q2 25
$41.4M
$38.3M
Q1 25
$40.6M
$35.3M
Q4 24
$40.4M
$35.2M
Q3 24
$39.3M
$31.8M
Q2 24
$38.1M
$30.7M
Net Profit
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
$15.0M
$18.6M
Q4 25
$17.6M
Q3 25
$12.8M
$16.3M
Q2 25
$11.0M
$14.5M
Q1 25
$10.2M
$13.1M
Q4 24
$13.3M
Q3 24
$8.4M
$10.9M
Q2 24
$7.1M
$10.8M
Operating Margin
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
Q4 25
31.8%
52.9%
Q3 25
35.4%
53.8%
Q2 25
31.1%
52.4%
Q1 25
29.4%
52.0%
Q4 24
28.2%
55.1%
Q3 24
25.2%
48.0%
Q2 24
21.2%
49.4%
Net Margin
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
31.7%
41.3%
Q4 25
40.6%
Q3 25
28.9%
39.6%
Q2 25
26.6%
37.9%
Q1 25
25.0%
37.1%
Q4 24
37.9%
Q3 24
21.3%
34.4%
Q2 24
18.5%
35.2%
EPS (diluted)
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
$0.72
$0.87
Q4 25
$0.59
$0.83
Q3 25
$0.68
$0.77
Q2 25
$0.71
$0.68
Q1 25
$0.66
$0.62
Q4 24
$0.62
$0.61
Q3 24
$0.53
$0.52
Q2 24
$0.45
$0.51

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$644.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$553.9M
$458.5M
Total Assets
$4.3B
$5.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
$644.4M
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
$553.9M
$458.5M
Q4 25
$543.5M
$445.8M
Q3 25
$499.0M
$431.3M
Q2 25
$404.1M
$416.7M
Q1 25
$397.4M
$406.5M
Q4 24
$388.5M
$396.6M
Q3 24
$394.4M
$389.9M
Q2 24
$373.8M
$380.5M
Total Assets
CIVB
CIVB
FSBC
FSBC
Q1 26
$4.3B
$5.0B
Q4 25
$4.3B
$4.8B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$4.6B
Q2 25
$4.2B
$4.4B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$4.2B
Q4 24
$4.1B
$4.1B
Q3 24
$4.1B
$3.9B
Q2 24
$4.0B
$3.6B

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CIVB
CIVB

Net Interest Income$37.8M80%
Noninterest Income$9.4M20%

FSBC
FSBC

Net Interest Income$43.5M96%
Noninterest Income$1.6M4%

Related Comparisons