vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Envela Corp (ELA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Envela Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.5M vs $67.5M, roughly 1.2× Chatham Lodging Trust). Envela Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs 1.1%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Envela Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.6% vs -1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Envela Corp's revenue compounded faster (42.1% CAGR vs -11.6%).
Chatham Lodging Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in, owns, and operates upscale extended-stay and select-service premium hotel properties primarily across high-demand urban and suburban markets in the United States. Its portfolio targets assets with strong occupancy rates and steady cash flow from business and leisure traveler segments.
Envela Corporation is a U.S.-based company that provides recommerce services aimed at extending product lifecycles and reducing resource consumption. The company operates through two primary segments: consumer and commercial.
CLDT vs ELA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $67.5M | $80.5M |
| Net Profit | $725.0K | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | 66.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 274.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $67.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.4M | $57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.3M | $54.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.6M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.1M | $48.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.5M | $45.3M |
| Q1 26 | $725.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.7% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.1% | 25.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.3% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $722.9M | $67.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $96.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $338.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.8M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $351.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.9M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.3M |
| Q1 26 | $722.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $740.8M | $67.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.4M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $754.1M | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $754.7M | $55.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $758.2M | $52.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.3M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $766.5M | $50.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $82.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $79.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $77.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.46× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.50× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -4.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $-789.5K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $746.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.90× | -0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.24× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.10× | 0.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.73× | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.68× | -0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLDT
| Room | $61.2M | 91% |
| Other | $4.7M | 7% |
| Food and beverage | $1.6M | 2% |
ELA
| Consumer Segment | $67.7M | 84% |
| Commercial Segment | $12.8M | 16% |