vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 3.5%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 2.0%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $45.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
CLH vs FND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $39.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | -17.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $50.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 42.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $5.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $4.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $124.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $45.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 7.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 3.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $64.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $124.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $147.5M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $35.8M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 10.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 3.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 3.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 3.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 2.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
FND
| Laminate And Vinyl | $310.1M | 27% |
| Tile | $259.1M | 23% |
| Installation Materials And Tools | $218.4M | 19% |
| Decorative Accessories And Wall Tile | $177.0M | 16% |
| Wood | $83.2M | 7% |
| Natural Stone | $46.8M | 4% |
| Adjacent Categories | $26.6M | 2% |
| Other | $8.5M | 1% |
