vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.0× BeOne Medicines Ltd.). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 4.4%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BeOne Medicines Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.8% vs 4.8%). BeOne Medicines Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($379.8M vs $233.3M). Over the past eight quarters, BeOne Medicines Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (41.2% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
BeOne Medicines Ltd.ONCEarnings & Financial Report
BeOne Medicines, formerly known as BeiGene, Ltd. is a multinational oncology company. It specializes in the development of drugs for cancer treatment.
CLH vs ONC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $66.5M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 12.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 32.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 143.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $929.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $751.7M |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $66.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $-151.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $-121.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $-120.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $-251.2M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 90.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 86.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 87.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 85.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 85.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 85.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 83.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | -34.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -33.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $836.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $836.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $417.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $379.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 25.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 6.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $941.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $417.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $402.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $75.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $188.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $-95.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $-308.6M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $379.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $354.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $219.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $-205.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $-465.1M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | -22.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | -61.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 6.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 3.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 2.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 34.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
ONC
Segment breakdown not available.
