vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.4× CLEAN HARBORS INC). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 5.8%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 4.8%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $233.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
CLH vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
