vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rockwell Automation (ROK) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rockwell Automation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.0× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 14.5%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rockwell Automation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 11.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $170.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Rockwell Automation, Inc. is an American provider of industrial automation and digital transformation technologies headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Its brands include Allen-Bradley, FactoryTalk software and LifecycleIQ Services. Rockwell Automation employs approximately 27,000 people and has customers in more than 100 countries worldwide.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ROK vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 14.5% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.8% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.69 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $305.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.1M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 48.3% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.5% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.4% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.9% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.8% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.7% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.69 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.24 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.60 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.22 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.61 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.09 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.02 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $444.0M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $444.0M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $468.0M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $495.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.0M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $471.3M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.0M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $170.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.1% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.77× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.0M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $454.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $527.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.0M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.3M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.1M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $170.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $293.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $238.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.29× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROK
| Productsand Solutions | $1.9B | 89% |
| Lifecycle Services Segment | $259.0M | 12% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.