vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.4× JBG SMITH Properties). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -35.7%, a 37.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -6.3%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
CLMB vs JBGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $127.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-45.5M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -47.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -35.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $127.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $123.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $126.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $130.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $135.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-59.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-24.4M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -47.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -24.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | -35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -45.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -18.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $75.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $75.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $64.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $163.5M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $23.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
