vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.1× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 1.8%, a 23.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 4.9%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
CLMB vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $157.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $39.4M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $2.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $261.5M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $50.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
