vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. (SWBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $124.7M, roughly 1.5× SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs 1.5%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs -3.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -4.8%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
CLMB vs SWBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $124.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | -3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | -53.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $140.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $115.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $159.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $27.9M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 35.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 17.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 17.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $363.2M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $548.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $60.8M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $364.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $372.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $366.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $371.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $380.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $399.9M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $548.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $559.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $578.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $571.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $577.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $27.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $21.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $43.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 14.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | -4.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | -1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
