vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEARONE INC (CLRO) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEARONE INC runs the higher net margin — 116.9% vs -29.3%, a 146.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEARONE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, DNA X, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
ClearOne Inc is a global provider of innovative audio and video communication solutions, including professional conferencing systems, collaboration tools and AV distribution products. It serves enterprise, education, healthcare and live event production segments, delivering solutions for smooth remote and in-person collaboration.
CLRO vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-4.2M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $-4.9M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 116.9% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -124.3% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.10 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.9M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.7M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.2M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -237.9% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -123.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -126.9% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -57.4% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 116.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -238.6% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.2% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -122.4% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -52.4% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.92 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.64 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.48 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.29 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.76 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $220.0K | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-714.0K | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $2.3M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $220.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $961.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-714.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.5M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.6M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.3M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.0M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.7M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.5M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | $42.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $433.0K | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.6M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $364.0K | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.7% | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -139.8% | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
