vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NETGEAR, INC. (NTGR) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NETGEAR, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.5M vs $16.2M, roughly 11.3× DNA X, Inc.). On growth, DNA X, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, DNA X, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 5.3%).
Netgear, Inc., is an American computer networking company based in San Jose, California, with offices in about 22 other countries. It produces networking hardware for consumers, businesses, and service providers. The company operates in three business segments: retail, commercial, and as a service provider.
NTGR vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.5M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.0% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $182.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.6M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.5M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $162.1M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.4M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.9M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $164.6M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.9M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-45.2M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.6M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.1% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.3% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.8% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.6% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.3% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.6% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.8% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.5% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.4% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.3% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.29 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.90 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.56 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.63 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $323.0M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $497.8M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $836.3M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $323.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $326.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $391.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $408.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $395.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.3M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.4M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $497.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.8M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $523.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $534.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $550.3M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $459.4M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $511.4M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $836.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $810.8M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $803.5M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $814.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $850.2M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $862.6M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $754.1M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $801.3M | $42.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.5M | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-18.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.7M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.7M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.0M | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.7M | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.0% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
