vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK) and Oportun Financial Corp (OPRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Oportun Financial Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($247.7M vs $181.2M, roughly 1.4× CLEANSPARK, INC.). Oportun Financial Corp runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -209.0%, a 210.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEANSPARK, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs -0.5%).
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
Oportun Financial Corp is a US-based fintech firm that provides accessible, responsible financial services including personal loans, credit cards, and savings products to underserved low-to-moderate income consumers, many with limited or no credit history, leveraging proprietary AI underwriting to deliver fair terms while mitigating operational risk.
CLSK vs OPRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.2M | $247.7M |
| Net Profit | $-378.7M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -174.7% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | -209.0% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | -1.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -253.5% | -61.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $247.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $234.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $250.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $250.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.1M | $250.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.8M | $250.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-378.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.2M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-236.2M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.7M | $-26.4M |
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -174.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -239.2% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | -209.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 200.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -226.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 113.4% | -10.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.78 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.1M | $105.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $390.1M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.1M | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $71.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.1M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $390.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $383.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $376.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $353.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $327.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $354.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $382.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-161.1M | $413.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-198.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -109.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 121.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-626.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-161.1M | $413.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-233.7M | $108.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.4M | $107.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.8M | $85.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-198.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-299.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -109.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 121.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
