vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hubbell Incorporated is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $838.0M, roughly 1.8× COMERICA INC). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 14.6%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hubbell Incorporated posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
CMA vs HUBB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $217.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.3% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | 10.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $4.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $784.0M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $255.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $244.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | $169.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $219.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $213.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.0M | $147.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $4.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $4.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $3.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $3.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $4.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | $3.94 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $2.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $497.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $497.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $680.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $360.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $345.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $445.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $406.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $400.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.4B | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 0.65× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | $447.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $388.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | 2.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $874.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | $284.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | $260.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $37.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $432.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-205.0M | $92.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $388.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $220.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $188.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $205.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.49× | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMA
Segment breakdown not available.
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |