vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and TFI International Inc. (TFII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TFI International Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($921.9M vs $838.0M, roughly 1.1× COMERICA INC).

Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.

TFI International Inc. is a Canadian transport and logistics company based in Saint-Laurent, Quebec, a borough of Montreal. It operates primarily in Canada, the United States, and Mexico through 4 business segments: less than truckload (LTL), package and courier, logistics, and truckload. It has Canada's largest LTL business, largest trucking fleet, and in 2021 was ranked 6th in terms of revenue among both LTL and truckload North American carriers. Its trucking fleet consists of over 14,000 c...

CMA vs TFII — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TFII
TFII
1.1× larger
TFII
$921.9M
$838.0M
CMA

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Revenue
$838.0M
$921.9M
Net Profit
$176.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
8.4%
Net Margin
21.0%
Revenue YoY
3.3%
Net Profit YoY
-4.3%
EPS (diluted)
$1.35

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
$838.0M
$921.9M
Q2 25
$849.0M
$2.0B
Q1 25
$829.0M
$2.0B
Q4 24
$825.0M
Q3 24
$811.0M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$824.0M
$2.3B
Q1 24
$784.0M
$1.9B
Q4 23
$192.0M
Net Profit
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
$176.0M
Q2 25
$199.0M
$98.2M
Q1 25
$172.0M
$56.0M
Q4 24
$170.0M
Q3 24
$184.0M
Q2 24
$206.0M
$117.8M
Q1 24
$138.0M
$92.8M
Q4 23
$33.0M
Operating Margin
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
8.4%
Q2 25
8.4%
Q1 25
5.8%
Q4 24
Q3 24
9.5%
Q2 24
9.2%
Q1 24
8.1%
Q4 23
Net Margin
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
21.0%
Q2 25
23.4%
4.8%
Q1 25
20.7%
2.9%
Q4 24
20.6%
Q3 24
22.7%
Q2 24
25.0%
5.2%
Q1 24
17.6%
5.0%
Q4 23
17.2%
EPS (diluted)
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
$1.35
Q2 25
$1.42
Q1 25
$1.25
Q4 24
$1.22
Q3 24
$1.33
Q2 24
$1.49
Q1 24
$0.98
Q4 23
$0.20

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.4B
Total Assets
$77.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.73×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Total Debt
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
$5.4B
Q2 25
$5.8B
Q1 25
$5.7B
Q4 24
$6.7B
Q3 24
$6.8B
Q2 24
$7.1B
Q1 24
$7.1B
Q4 23
$6.2B
Stockholders' Equity
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
$7.4B
Q2 25
$6.9B
Q1 25
$7.1B
Q4 24
$6.5B
Q3 24
$7.4B
Q2 24
$6.2B
Q1 24
$6.0B
Q4 23
$6.4B
Total Assets
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
$77.4B
Q2 25
$78.0B
Q1 25
$77.6B
Q4 24
$79.3B
Q3 24
$79.7B
Q2 24
$79.6B
Q1 24
$79.4B
Q4 23
$85.8B
Debt / Equity
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
0.73×
Q2 25
0.84×
Q1 25
0.81×
Q4 24
1.02×
Q3 24
0.92×
Q2 24
1.15×
Q1 24
1.18×
Q4 23
0.97×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-270.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-1.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
$-270.0M
Q2 25
$476.0M
Q1 25
$273.0M
Q4 24
$601.0M
Q3 24
$1.0B
Q2 24
$111.0M
Q1 24
$-205.0M
Q4 23
$1.1B
Cash Conversion
CMA
CMA
TFII
TFII
Q3 25
-1.53×
Q2 25
2.39×
Q1 25
1.59×
Q4 24
3.54×
Q3 24
5.70×
Q2 24
0.54×
Q1 24
-1.49×
Q4 23
34.00×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons