vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CMB.TECH NV is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($592.8M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.7× INTERFACE INC). CMB.TECH NV runs the higher net margin — 32.3% vs 7.0%, a 25.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.3% vs -34.6%).
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
CMBT vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.8M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $191.2M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 46.4% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 32.3% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -34.6% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.3% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.8M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.2M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.9M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.20× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.9M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.4M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMBT
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
