vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Creative Media & Community Trust Corp (CMCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $28.5M, roughly 1.6× Creative Media & Community Trust Corp). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -125.8%, a 132.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -8.5%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Creative Media & Community Trust Corp is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust operating two core segments: it owns, manages and develops creative media facilities including professional film and TV production studios, plus community-focused assets such as affordable housing, neighborhood healthcare centers and local commercial spaces, serving media operators and local communities nationwide.
CMCL vs CMCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $28.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-11.4M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -125.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -125.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -11.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-3.89 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $34.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-796.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -125.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -128.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -36.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -125.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -129.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-23.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-18.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.73 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $97.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-305.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-98.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-125.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $15.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $509.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $265.4M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $859.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $29.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $21.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $509.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $527.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $535.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $512.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $505.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $478.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $485.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $472.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $265.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $287.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $293.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $321.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $351.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $369.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $859.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $871.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $885.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $882.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $889.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $868.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $891.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $887.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
