vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.2× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 7.0%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs 17.1%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
CMCL vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $56.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 60.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 14.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 55.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -83.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -197.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 71.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -222.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $30.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $340.3M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $360.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $296.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $162.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $710.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 214.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | 15.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $207.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 90.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
