vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and PCB BANCORP (PCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $29.2M, roughly 1.6× PCB BANCORP). On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
PCB Bank is an American community bank that focuses on the Korean-American community based in California and offers commercial banking services. It has branches in 8 states and is the third largest Korean American Bank after Bank of Hope and Hanmi Bank.
CMCL vs PCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $29.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 45.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 30.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 19.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $207.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $390.0M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $207.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $369.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $214.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $198.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $239.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $384.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $376.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $363.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $362.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $353.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $350.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $2.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $26.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $24.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 83.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 133.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
