vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.1× Core Natural Resources, Inc.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -7.6%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Core Natural Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81.8% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $26.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Core Natural Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.1% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Arch Resources, previously known as Arch Coal, was an American coal mining and processing company. The company mined, processed, and marketed bituminous and sub-bituminous coal with low sulfur content in the United States. Arch Resources was the second-largest supplier of coal in the United States, behind Peabody Energy. As of 2011 the company supplied 15% of the domestic market. Demand came mainly from generators of electricity.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
CNR vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-79.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | -7.6% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 81.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.3% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.51 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $490.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $546.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-79.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.6M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.3M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.9M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.51 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.70 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.38 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.04 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.22 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.39 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $432.2M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.2M | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.7M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.2M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.5M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.2M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.7M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.6M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $354.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.5M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.8M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.7M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.9M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.5M | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.08× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.3M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $26.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.5% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $21.2M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.3M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.9M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.2M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-109.6M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.3M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.3M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.5M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-174.5M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.5M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.9M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.9M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.78× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CNR
| Other | $397.4M | 38% |
| Power Generation | $376.5M | 36% |
| PRB | $183.0M | 18% |
| Metallurgical | $42.0M | 4% |
| Industrial | $34.1M | 3% |
| Terminal Revenue | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Revenue | $3.0M | 0% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |