vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) and GSI TECHNOLOGY INC (GSIT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.3M vs $6.1M, roughly 1.2× GSI TECHNOLOGY INC). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.1% vs -49.7%, a 63.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.8% vs 12.2%). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-8.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.7% CAGR vs 8.6%).
CODA plc was a mid-sized international financial software company based in the United Kingdom. Founded in 1979, it was purchased in 2008 by Unit4, a supplier of enterprise software, based in the Netherlands. CODA creates, markets and implements a range of business software systems designed for finance directors and finance departments. These include:financial management systems like accounting software and procurement software: financial analysis applications like reporting, consolidation and...
Triad GSI is an American voting machine vendor based in Xenia, Ohio. Their main products are election-related computer hardware and software for counting ballots, as well as voter registration.
CODA vs GSIT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.3M | $6.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.0M | $-3.0M |
| Gross Margin | 67.6% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | -113.7% |
| Net Margin | 14.1% | -49.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.8% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 214.3% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $908.8K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $913.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.2K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $629.9K | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.3% | 54.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.1% | 58.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.8% | 56.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.3% | 54.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.9% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.2% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.2% | 51.6% |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | -113.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -49.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -34.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -38.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | -122.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -87.6% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | -49.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | -49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | -35.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | -37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | -74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | -120.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | -83.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $70.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.1M | $83.6M |
| Total Assets | $64.5M | $98.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5M | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.0M | $14.4M |
| Q4 25 | $58.1M | $83.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.9M | $37.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.1M | $28.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.1M | $29.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.8M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.1M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.1M | $36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $64.5M | $98.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.9M | $52.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.9M | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.9M | $47.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.0M | $42.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.9M | $-7.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.5M | $-8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.9% | -134.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.0M | $-12.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-887.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.5K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-955.8K | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-298.0K | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $-906.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.4K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-433.6K | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -134.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | -28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | -66.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.2% | -76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.9% | -92.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | -139.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.68× | -3.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CODA
| Segment Reporting | $3.1M | 42% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 24% |
| Precision Acoustics Limited | $1.3M | 18% |
| Other | $1.1M | 15% |
GSIT
| Distribution | $5.6M | 92% |
| Other | $459.0K | 8% |
