vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GSI TECHNOLOGY INC (GSIT) and Peraso Inc. (PRSO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GSI TECHNOLOGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1M vs $2.9M, roughly 2.1× Peraso Inc.). Peraso Inc. runs the higher net margin — -43.3% vs -49.7%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GSI TECHNOLOGY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs -22.0%). Over the past eight quarters, GSI TECHNOLOGY INC's revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs 1.0%).
Triad GSI is an American voting machine vendor based in Xenia, Ohio. Their main products are election-related computer hardware and software for counting ballots, as well as voter registration.
Peraso Inc. is a semiconductor technology firm specializing in the design and production of high-performance millimeter wave (mmWave) integrated circuits and modules. It delivers 5G and next-generation wireless connectivity solutions for telecom infrastructure, industrial IoT, fixed wireless access and consumer electronics segments, serving customers across North America, Asia Pacific and European markets.
GSIT vs PRSO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1M | $2.9M |
| Net Profit | $-3.0M | $-1.2M |
| Gross Margin | 52.7% | 52.2% |
| Operating Margin | -113.7% | -44.6% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | -43.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.2% | -22.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.0% | 20.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-471.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.3M | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.8% | 56.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | 48.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.1% | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.0% | 56.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.3% | 55.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.6% | 46.4% |
| Q4 25 | -113.7% | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -49.5% | -36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.6% | -80.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.7% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -74.9% | -44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -122.7% | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | -105.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -87.6% | -128.9% |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | -43.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -49.4% | -37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.3% | -82.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -74.4% | -42.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -120.0% | -70.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -83.9% | -72.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.16 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-1.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | $-1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $70.7M | $2.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $83.6M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $98.5M | $6.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $70.7M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.1M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.4M | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $83.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.0M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $98.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.4M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.5M | $11.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.9M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -134.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-887.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-966.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $-687.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $-683.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $-659.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-906.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -134.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.1% | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -66.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -76.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -92.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -139.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.96× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSIT
| Distribution | $5.6M | 92% |
| Other | $459.0K | 8% |
PRSO
| Products | $2.8M | 96% |
| Other | $105.0K | 4% |