vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. (COLB) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $677.0M, roughly 1.8× COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.). COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 15.5%, a 12.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.9% vs 28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (19.7% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, d.b.a. Umpqua Bank, was a financial holding company based in downtown Portland, Oregon, United States. Headquarters were in the Umpqua Bank Plaza, formerly the headquarters of Benj. Franklin Savings and Loan. The firm had two principal operating subsidiaries: Umpqua Bank and Umpqua Investments.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
COLB vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $677.0M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 28.4% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.9% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 120.7% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $677.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $716.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $582.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $491.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $487.1M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $496.0M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $472.2M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $215.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.0M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | 28.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.66 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.76 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $66.0B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $66.0B | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.8B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.6B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLB
Segment breakdown not available.
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
