vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. (COLB) and Stitch Fix, Inc. (SFIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($677.0M vs $342.1M, roughly 2.0× Stitch Fix, Inc.). COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs -1.9%, a 30.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.9% vs 7.3%). Over the past eight quarters, COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (19.7% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, d.b.a. Umpqua Bank, was a financial holding company based in downtown Portland, Oregon, United States. Headquarters were in the Umpqua Bank Plaza, formerly the headquarters of Benj. Franklin Savings and Loan. The firm had two principal operating subsidiaries: Umpqua Bank and Umpqua Investments.
Stitch Fix, Inc. is an online personal styling service in the United States. It uses recommendation algorithms and data science to personalize clothing items based on size, budget and style. The company was founded in 2011 and had an initial public offering in 2017 with a valuation of $1.6 billion. Stitch Fix generated $1.6 billion in net revenue in its fiscal year 2023, a decrease of 21% year-over-year and reported 3,297,000 active clients in September 2023. It is headquartered in San Franci...
COLB vs SFIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $677.0M | $342.1M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $-6.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.5% |
| Net Margin | 28.4% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.9% | 7.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 120.7% | -1.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $677.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $716.7M | $342.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $582.0M | $311.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.9M | $325.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $491.4M | $312.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $487.1M | $318.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $496.0M | $319.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $472.2M | $322.7M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $215.0M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.0M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0M | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.0M | $-21.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.7% |
| Q1 26 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.7% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -6.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.76 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $244.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $204.1M |
| Total Assets | $66.0B | $530.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $244.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $234.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $219.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $253.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $247.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $244.5M |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $204.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $203.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $200.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $190.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $187.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $208.9M |
| Q1 26 | $66.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.8B | $530.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5B | $480.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9B | $484.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.5B | $472.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.6B | $507.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9B | $486.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0B | $537.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $5.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $746.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.8M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.0M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $659.0M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.3M | $21.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
