vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) and LCI INDUSTRIES (LCII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LCI INDUSTRIES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($932.7M vs $539.1M, roughly 1.7× Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.). Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.4% vs 2.0%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($98.5M vs $64.3M).

Concentra Inc., is a national health care establishment centered around occupational health. It was founded in 1979 in Amarillo, Texas, and the headquarters of the corporation is in Addison, Texas. It runs 627 occupational health centers and 410 onsite health clinics at employer worksites across 47 states. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Concentra treats one out of every seven occupational injuries in the United States. It is currently a publicly traded company with over 80% of t...

Lucky Core Industries Limited, formerly known as ICI Pakistan, is a Pakistani conglomerate company headquartered in Karachi. It manufactures polyester, pharmaceutical, agrochemical, soda ash, and veterinary medicine.

CON vs LCII — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LCII
LCII
1.7× larger
LCII
$932.7M
$539.1M
CON
Higher net margin
CON
CON
4.4% more per $
CON
6.4%
2.0%
LCII
More free cash flow
CON
CON
$34.2M more FCF
CON
$98.5M
$64.3M
LCII

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Revenue
$539.1M
$932.7M
Net Profit
$34.7M
$18.7M
Gross Margin
22.1%
Operating Margin
12.9%
3.8%
Net Margin
6.4%
2.0%
Revenue YoY
16.1%
Net Profit YoY
95.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.27
$0.79

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$539.1M
$932.7M
Q3 25
$572.8M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$550.8M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$500.8M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$803.1M
Q3 24
$489.6M
$915.5M
Q2 24
$477.9M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$968.0M
Net Profit
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$34.7M
$18.7M
Q3 25
$48.3M
$62.5M
Q2 25
$44.6M
$57.6M
Q1 25
$38.9M
$49.4M
Q4 24
$9.5M
Q3 24
$44.3M
$35.6M
Q2 24
$51.7M
$61.2M
Q1 24
$36.5M
Gross Margin
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
22.1%
Q3 25
24.4%
Q2 25
24.4%
Q1 25
24.1%
Q4 24
21.1%
Q3 24
24.0%
Q2 24
25.3%
Q1 24
23.1%
Operating Margin
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
12.9%
3.8%
Q3 25
16.5%
7.3%
Q2 25
16.3%
7.9%
Q1 25
16.0%
7.8%
Q4 24
2.0%
Q3 24
17.6%
5.9%
Q2 24
17.6%
8.6%
Q1 24
6.0%
Net Margin
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
6.4%
2.0%
Q3 25
8.4%
6.0%
Q2 25
8.1%
5.2%
Q1 25
7.8%
4.7%
Q4 24
1.2%
Q3 24
9.1%
3.9%
Q2 24
10.8%
5.8%
Q1 24
3.8%
EPS (diluted)
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$0.27
$0.79
Q3 25
$0.38
$2.55
Q2 25
$0.35
$2.29
Q1 25
$0.30
$1.94
Q4 24
$0.37
Q3 24
$0.37
$1.39
Q2 24
$0.50
$2.40
Q1 24
$1.44

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$79.9M
$222.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.6B
$945.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$393.3M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$2.9B
$3.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.98×
0.69×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$79.9M
$222.6M
Q3 25
$49.9M
$199.7M
Q2 25
$73.9M
$191.9M
Q1 25
$52.1M
$231.2M
Q4 24
$165.8M
Q3 24
$136.8M
$161.2M
Q2 24
$50.7M
$130.4M
Q1 24
$22.6M
Total Debt
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$1.6B
$945.2M
Q3 25
$1.6B
$947.8M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$948.0M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$938.3M
Q4 24
$757.3M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$822.5M
Q2 24
$3.0M
$829.7M
Q1 24
$855.3M
Stockholders' Equity
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$393.3M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$385.5M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$342.6M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$307.1M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$277.8M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.4B
Total Assets
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$2.9B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$2.8B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$3.1B
Q4 24
$2.9B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$3.0B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$3.0B
Q1 24
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
3.98×
0.69×
Q3 25
4.15×
0.70×
Q2 25
4.82×
0.68×
Q1 25
5.27×
0.69×
Q4 24
0.55×
Q3 24
5.30×
0.58×
Q2 24
0.00×
0.60×
Q1 24
0.63×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$118.7M
$78.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$98.5M
$64.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
18.3%
6.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.7%
1.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.42×
4.22×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$197.1M
$278.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$118.7M
$78.9M
Q3 25
$60.6M
$97.2M
Q2 25
$88.4M
$112.2M
Q1 25
$11.7M
$42.7M
Q4 24
$106.6M
Q3 24
$65.9M
$78.4M
Q2 24
$192.9M
Q1 24
$-7.7M
Free Cash Flow
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
$98.5M
$64.3M
Q3 25
$39.4M
$80.9M
Q2 25
$63.2M
$99.5M
Q1 25
$-4.0M
$33.7M
Q4 24
$95.7M
Q3 24
$50.8M
$68.3M
Q2 24
$180.2M
Q1 24
$-16.3M
FCF Margin
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
18.3%
6.9%
Q3 25
6.9%
7.8%
Q2 25
11.5%
9.0%
Q1 25
-0.8%
3.2%
Q4 24
11.9%
Q3 24
10.4%
7.5%
Q2 24
17.1%
Q1 24
-1.7%
Capex Intensity
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
3.7%
1.6%
Q3 25
3.7%
1.6%
Q2 25
4.6%
1.2%
Q1 25
3.1%
0.9%
Q4 24
1.4%
Q3 24
3.1%
1.1%
Q2 24
1.2%
Q1 24
0.9%
Cash Conversion
CON
CON
LCII
LCII
Q4 25
3.42×
4.22×
Q3 25
1.26×
1.55×
Q2 25
1.98×
1.95×
Q1 25
0.30×
0.86×
Q4 24
11.17×
Q3 24
1.49×
2.20×
Q2 24
3.15×
Q1 24
-0.21×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CON
CON

Occupational Health Center Workers Compensation$328.5M61%
Occupational Health Center Employer Services$151.9M28%
Onsite Health Clinics$36.2M7%
Other Businesses$12.3M2%
Occupational Health Center Consumer Health$8.1M2%
Occupational Health Center Other$2.1M0%

LCII
LCII

Travel Trailer And Fifth Wheels$378.4M41%
Chassis Chassis Partsand Slideout Mechanisms$206.1M22%
Furnitureand Mattresses$120.4M13%
Appliances$69.9M7%
Other Products$69.1M7%
Axlesand Suspension Solutions$62.3M7%
Motorhomes$34.2M4%

Related Comparisons