vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ConocoPhillips (COP) and Salesforce (CRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ConocoPhillips is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.4B vs $10.3B, roughly 1.1× Salesforce). Salesforce runs the higher net margin — 20.3% vs 12.7%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Salesforce posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs -10.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Salesforce's revenue compounded faster (5.1% CAGR vs -3.8%).
ConocoPhillips Company is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and production. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
Salesforce, Inc., is an American cloud-based software company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It provides applications focused on sales, customer service, marketing automation, e-commerce, analytics, artificial intelligence, agentic AI, and application development.
COP vs CRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.4B | $10.3B |
| Net Profit | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 78.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 21.3% |
| Net Margin | 12.7% | 20.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.7% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.5% | 36.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | $2.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $10.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $10.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.7B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3B | $9.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 54.4% | 78.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | 78.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.7% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.3% | 77.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.2% | 77.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.4% | 76.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.6% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | 76.9% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.9% | 17.5% |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.7% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.18 | $2.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $1.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $1.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.23 | $1.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.92 | $1.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.76 | $1.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.98 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.15 | $1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.4B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $64.5B | $60.0B |
| Total Assets | $121.9B | $95.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | 0.14× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $10.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1B | $8.5B |
| Q4 25 | $22.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3B | $9.4B |
| Q4 25 | $64.5B | $60.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.9B | $61.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.6B | $60.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.2B | $61.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.8B | $58.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9B | $57.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.7B | $59.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.3B | $59.6B |
| Q4 25 | $121.9B | $95.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5B | $97.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.6B | $98.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3B | $102.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.8B | $91.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7B | $92.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.0B | $96.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.3B | $99.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.3B | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.2B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 21.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.99× | 1.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.9B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $740.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $892.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $755.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 66.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.99× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.41× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | 4.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.15× | 2.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 4.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.95× | 2.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COP
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.1B | 18% |
| Physical Gas Contracts | $2.0B | 18% |
| Europe Middle East And North Africa Segment | $1.6B | 14% |
| Natural Gas Product Line | $1.5B | 13% |
| Canada Operating Segment | $1.3B | 12% |
| Alaska Segment | $1.3B | 11% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $826.0M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific Operating Segment | $360.0M | 3% |
| Crude Oil Product Line | $236.0M | 2% |
| Related Party | $12.0M | 0% |
| Corporate Segment | $7.0M | 0% |
CRM
| Agentforce Service | $2.5B | 24% |
| Agentforce Sales | $2.3B | 22% |
| Agentforce360Platform Slack And Other | $2.2B | 21% |
| Agentforce Integration And Agentforce Analytics | $1.4B | 14% |
| Agentforce Marketing And Agentforce Commerce | $1.4B | 13% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $533.0M | 5% |
