vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.9M vs $79.8M, roughly 1.8× Core Scientific, Inc.). Core Scientific, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 268.5% vs -30.3%, a 298.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -16.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -33.3%).
Core Scientific is a leading digital asset and high-performance computing infrastructure provider. It operates large energy-efficient data centers across North America, offering cryptocurrency mining services, colocation hosting for blockchain and AI clients, and custom high-performance computing solutions for enterprise tech segments.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
CORZ vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.8M | $142.9M |
| Net Profit | $214.2M | $-43.2M |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 268.5% | -30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.0% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 180.6% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.63 | $-0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.8M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.1M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.6M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.9M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.4M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.1M | $143.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $179.3M | $144.5M |
| Q4 25 | $214.2M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-144.0M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-936.8M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-265.5M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-455.3M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-902.2M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.7M | $-27.8M |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -149.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -67.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -64.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 268.5% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1191.4% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 724.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -279.7% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -477.4% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -639.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 117.5% | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.63 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.24 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.51 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.17 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.78 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $311.4M | $731.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-962.7M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $311.4M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $453.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $581.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $697.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $836.2M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.0M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.1M | $138.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.1M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-962.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-308.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-943.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-826.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-318.5M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.6M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $814.0M | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $278.3M | $140.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-450.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -565.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 914.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-779.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $278.3M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.8M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.0M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.9M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $23.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-450.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-112.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-129.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-52.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -565.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -139.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -111.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -162.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 914.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 301.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 154.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 105.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.11× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CORZ
| Other | $36.3M | 46% |
| Digital Asset Self Mining Service | $31.8M | 40% |
| Colocation Service | $11.6M | 15% |
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |