vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $21.3M, roughly 2.0× CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-5.9M).
CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. is a U.S.-based regional bank holding company. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, consumer loans, mortgages, commercial financing and wealth management solutions for retail customers and small-to-medium enterprises across the U.S. Gulf Coast region.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
COSO vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 41.2% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $41.9M |
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.7% |
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.4% | 29.8% |
| Q3 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $250.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.5M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.9M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -27.7% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.82× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $11.4M |
| Q3 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $7.4M |
| Q3 25 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -90.3% | 17.6% |
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 9.6% |
| Q3 25 | -0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
