vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD (CP) and Exelon (EXC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Exelon is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.9× CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD). On growth, CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.3% vs -19.4%). Over the past eight quarters, CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LTD's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 0.5%).
The Canadian National Railway Company is a Canadian Class I freight railway headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, which serves Canada and the Midwestern and Southern United States. It is one of Canada's two main freight rail companies, along with Canadian Pacific Kansas City.
Exelon Corporation is an American public utility headquartered in Chicago, and incorporated in Pennsylvania. Exelon is the largest electric parent company in the United States by revenue and is the largest regulated electric utility in the United States with approximately 10 million customers. The company is ranked 187th on the Fortune 500.
CP vs EXC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $5.4B |
| Net Profit | $786.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 21.9% |
| Net Margin | 27.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 1.3% | -19.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $786.2M | $594.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $671.6M | $875.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $900.8M | $391.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $664.3M | $908.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.7M | $647.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $611.0M | $707.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $660.6M | $448.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.6% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.6% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.3% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | 17.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.3M | $626.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6B | $49.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.5B | $28.8B |
| Total Assets | $62.7B | $116.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 1.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $626.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.3M | $626.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $583.3M | $724.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $539.5M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $338.0M | $616.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.6M | $934.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5B | $44.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $28.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.5B | $28.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $28.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.7B | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.2B | $27.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0B | $26.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0B | $26.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $116.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $62.7B | $116.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.3B | $113.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.2B | $111.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.3B | $109.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.1B | $107.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.0B | $106.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4B | $105.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.41× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $537.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $930.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $989.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $843.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $928.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $932.9M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $537.3M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.2M | $163.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $446.8M | $-502.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.9M | $-746.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $702.3M | $-510.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $382.5M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $343.1M | $-237.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.9% | -22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | -4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 31.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.42× | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.38× | 2.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.10× | 3.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.27× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 3.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
