vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canterbury Park Holding Corp (CPHC) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.9M vs $12.4M, roughly 1.2× Canterbury Park Holding Corp). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -3.1%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 3.9%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs -6.0%).
Canterbury Park, is a horse racing track in Shakopee, Minnesota, United States. Canterbury Park Holding Corporation hosts parimutuel wagering on live thoroughbred and quarter horse racing at its facilities in Shakopee and parimutuel wagering on races held at out-of-state racetracks that are simulcast to the racetrack. In addition, the Canterbury Park Card Casino operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and is also regulated by the Minnesota Racing Commission. Casino games include blackjack...
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
CPHC vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.4M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $-390.1K | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | -3.1% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.9% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 68.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-390.1K | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $487.3K | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-327.4K | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-299.2K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.3K | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.8% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.1M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $83.9M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $112.6M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.1M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.9M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.1M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.6M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.1M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.2M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.4M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.9M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.4M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.9M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.2M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.4M | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-103.4K | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-611.3K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-103.4K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-611.3K | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-395.3K | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25 | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -55.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.0% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.56× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CPHC
| Casino | $9.5M | 76% |
| Other | $1.9M | 15% |
| Food And Beverage | $1.0M | 8% |
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
