vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $739.8M, roughly 1.5× Circle Internet Group, Inc.). Circle Internet Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 29.0% vs 5.0%, a 24.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Circle Internet Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5113.5% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $-14.7M).
Circle is a payments technology company. Funded by Jeremy Allaire and Sean Neville in 2013, it is currently headquartered in New York City and issues two types of stablecoin: USDC, which has a conversion rate pegged to the U.S. dollar, and EURC, which is euro-denominated. It also issues USYC, a tokenized money market fund.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
CRCL vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $739.8M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $214.4M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 29.0% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5113.5% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 202.0% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.4M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-482.1M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -49.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 486.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.48 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $76.8B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.5M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $460.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.8B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.7M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.7M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.0% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.05× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.7M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.7M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.7M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRCL
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
