vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Liberty Broadband Corp (LBRDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($268.0M vs $261.0M, roughly 1.0× Liberty Broadband Corp). Liberty Broadband Corp runs the higher net margin — 146.7% vs 30.8%, a 115.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (272.1% vs 6.1%). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.5M vs $37.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's revenue compounded faster (124.8% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Seiko Group is a corporate group composed of Seiko Group Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates. It used to be recognized as a corporate group consisting of three core companies Seiko Holdings Corp., Seiko Instruments Inc., and Seiko Epson Corp. The three companies were linked by a common thread of timepiece technology. Although Epson still develops and manufactures wristwatches for the Seiko Group, Epson and its subsidiaries are not considered part of the group.
Liberty Global Ltd. is a British-Dutch-American multinational telecommunications company domiciled in Bermuda, with headquarters in London, Amsterdam and Denver. Its respective legal names are Liberty Global Holdings Limited (UK), Liberty Global B.V. (Netherlands) and Liberty Global, Inc., with the first of these being publicly traded. It was formed in 2005 by the merger of the international arm of Liberty Media and UnitedGlobalCom (UGC).
CRDO vs LBRDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $268.0M | $261.0M |
| Net Profit | $82.6M | $383.0M |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.4% | 15.7% |
| Net Margin | 30.8% | 146.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 272.1% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2055.9% | 96.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.0M | $261.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.0M | $266.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $246.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.1M | $245.0M |
| Q4 25 | $82.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $383.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $268.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $291.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.5M | $195.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | $241.0M |
| Q4 25 | 67.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 61.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.1% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 146.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 100.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 110.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.0% | 54.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.2% | 79.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 98.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $2.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $2.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $1.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $1.69 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $813.6M | $180.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $16.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $813.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $431.3M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.2M | $226.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $163.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.6M | $168.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $410.0M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.1M | $108.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $781.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $681.6M | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $618.2M | $10.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.9M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.1M | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $540.2M | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.0M | $9.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $905.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.3M | $16.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $719.9M | $17.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $638.6M | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $644.9M | $16.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.9M | $16.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $592.5M | $15.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.40× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $61.7M | $91.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $38.5M | $37.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.4% | 14.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.7% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.75× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $143.6M | $-49.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $78.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.2M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-383.0K | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.7M | $-63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.1M | $-36.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $962.0K | $-35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.2% | -24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.9% | -13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.42× | 0.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRDO
| Other | $132.1M | 49% |
| HK | $104.4M | 39% |
| RESTOFTHEWORLD | $31.5M | 12% |
LBRDA
Segment breakdown not available.
