vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($268.0M vs $200.5M, roughly 1.3× ROGERS CORP). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs 2.2%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (272.1% vs 5.2%). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.5M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's revenue compounded faster (124.8% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Seiko Group is a corporate group composed of Seiko Group Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates. It used to be recognized as a corporate group consisting of three core companies Seiko Holdings Corp., Seiko Instruments Inc., and Seiko Epson Corp. The three companies were linked by a common thread of timepiece technology. Although Epson still develops and manufactures wristwatches for the Seiko Group, Epson and its subsidiaries are not considered part of the group.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
CRDO vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $268.0M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $82.6M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 30.8% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 272.1% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2055.9% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $268.0M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.1M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.0M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.0M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.5M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.2% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.8% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.7% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.2% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $813.6M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $813.6M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.6M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $431.3M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.2M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.6M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $410.0M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $781.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $681.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $618.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $540.2M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $905.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $719.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $638.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $644.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.9M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $61.7M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $38.5M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.4% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.7% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.75× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $143.6M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.2M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.2M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-383.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.7M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.1M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $962.0K | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRDO
| Other | $132.1M | 49% |
| HK | $104.4M | 39% |
| RESTOFTHEWORLD | $31.5M | 12% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
