vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CARTERS INC (CRI) and Essex Property Trust (ESS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CARTERS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($757.8M vs $479.6M, roughly 1.6× Essex Property Trust). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 1.5%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Essex Property Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.5% vs -0.1%).
Carter's, Inc. is a major American designer and marketer of children's apparel. It was founded in 1865 by William Carter.
Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.
CRI vs ESS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $757.8M | $479.6M |
| Net Profit | $11.6M | $85.7M |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 31.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.1% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.1% | -71.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $1.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $479.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $757.8M | $473.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.3M | $469.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $629.8M | $464.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $454.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $450.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $426.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $85.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $172.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $446.0K | $231.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $212.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $301.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $285.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.1% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.1% | 70.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.2% | 69.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 70.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 69.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $2.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $3.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.43 | $3.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $184.2M | $76.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $864.6M | $5.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.2M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $338.2M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $320.8M | $98.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $499.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $864.6M | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $853.9M | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $847.2M | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $13.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-128.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-144.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -19.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -11.04× | 12.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-128.0M | $342.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.3M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.6M | $281.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $316.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $218.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $314.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-144.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-59.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.04× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.37× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.13× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRI
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $362.3M | 48% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $283.8M | 37% |
| Other | $110.4M | 15% |
| Gift Cards | $1.3M | 0% |
ESS
Segment breakdown not available.