vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Construction Partners, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($769.2M vs $448.5M, roughly 1.7× CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 1.2%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Construction Partners, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.6% vs 5.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Construction Partners, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
Alexander Construction Company was a Palm Springs, California, residential development company that built over 2,200 houses in the Coachella Valley of Riverside County, California, between 1955 and 1965.
CRUS vs ROAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $448.5M | $769.2M |
| Net Profit | $81.8M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | 18.2% | 1.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 34.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 299.0% | 688.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.56 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $448.5M | $769.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $580.6M | $809.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $561.0M | $899.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.3M | $779.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.5M | $571.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.7M | $561.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $541.9M | $538.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $517.8M |
| Q1 26 | $81.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.6M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | 53.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 20.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 6.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.56 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.66 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.48 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.11 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.83 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $800.9M | $76.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $38.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $979.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $800.9M | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.1M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $593.5M | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.9M | $114.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.6M | $101.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4M | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.8M | $74.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $56.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $515.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | $979.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $969.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $912.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $853.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $807.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $811.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $573.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $552.9M |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $151.4M | $147.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.85× | 16.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $151.4M | $147.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $290.8M | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.2M | $112.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.4M | $55.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.6M | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.2M | $34.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $285.7M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.3M | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | $19.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.85× | 16.10× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 13.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRUS
| Audio | $257.2M | 57% |
| High-Performance Mixed-Signal | $191.3M | 43% |
ROAD
Segment breakdown not available.
