vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Cintas (CTAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.3× CONSTELLIUM SE). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 5.1%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($425.0M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
CSTM vs CTAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $495.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 23.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $491.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $448.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $463.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $448.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $414.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $397.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $4.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $200.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $10.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $200.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $138.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $243.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $342.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $128.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.0B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $531.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $425.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 15.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $1.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $531.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $414.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $635.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $622.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $441.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $466.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $657.1M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $425.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $312.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $521.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $522.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $373.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $591.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $550.1M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
