vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Garmin (GRMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.0× Garmin). Garmin runs the higher net margin — 24.9% vs 5.1%, a 19.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Garmin produced more free cash flow last quarter ($429.6M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Garmin Ltd. is an American multinational technology company based in Olathe, Kansas. The company designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes GPS-enabled products and other navigation, communication, sensor-based, and information products to the automotive, aviation, marine, outdoors, and sport markets.
CSTM vs GRMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $528.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 28.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 24.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 16.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $2.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $401.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $400.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $332.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $435.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $399.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $300.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 58.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $2.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $2.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $2.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $1.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $11.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $553.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $429.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 1.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $553.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $485.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $173.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $483.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $255.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $435.3M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $429.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $425.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $127.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $380.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $399.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $219.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $218.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $402.1M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 1.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
GRMN
| Fitness Segment | $765.8M | 36% |
| Outdoor Segment | $627.6M | 30% |
| Marine Segment | $296.9M | 14% |
| Aviation Segment | $274.2M | 13% |
| Auto Oem Segment | $160.4M | 8% |
