vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and MERCURY GENERAL CORP (MCY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.4× MERCURY GENERAL CORP). MERCURY GENERAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 5.1%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. MERCURY GENERAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($273.9M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Mercury General Corporation is a multiple-line insurance organization that offers personal automobiles, homeowners, renters, and business insurance. Mercury's primary focus is automobiles and homeowners' insurance.
CSTM vs MCY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $202.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 99.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 16.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 100.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $3.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $202.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $166.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $62.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $73.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 99.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 99.7% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $3.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $5.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $-1.96 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $575.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $9.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $287.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $273.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 17.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 1.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $287.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $496.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $371.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $318.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $357.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $-81.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $236.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $266.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $182.4M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 2.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
MCY
Segment breakdown not available.
