vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.7× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 5.1%, a 26.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
CSTM vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
