vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and KKR & Co. (KKR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $5.7B, roughly 1.1× KKR & Co.). KKR & Co. runs the higher net margin — 20.0% vs 7.8%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KKR & Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (76.1% vs 8.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (61.2% CAGR vs -22.9%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
KKR & Co. Inc., also known as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., is an American global private equity and investment company. As of December 31, 2024, the firm had completed 770 private-equity investments with approximately $790 billion of total enterprise value. Its assets under management (AUM) and fee paying assets under management (FPAUM) were $553 billion and $446 billion, respectively.
CTAS vs KKR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $5.7B |
| Net Profit | $502.5M | $1.1B |
| Gross Margin | 83.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 45.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 20.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | 76.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.4% | 1.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | $502.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $900.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $510.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $-185.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $600.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $667.9M |
| Q1 26 | 83.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 45.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 29.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $183.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $30.9B |
| Total Assets | — | $410.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $183.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $30.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $29.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $28.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $27.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $23.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $21.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $410.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $398.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $380.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $372.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $360.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $360.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $348.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $-4.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.3B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.12× | -4.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $-4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $438.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $-111.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | -4.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 2.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | -0.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 3.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 5.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
Segment breakdown not available.
KKR
| Insurance Segment | $3.5B | 61% |
| Asset Management1 | $703.7M | 12% |
| Transaction Fee | $512.0M | 9% |
| Transaction And Monitoring Fees | $268.7M | 5% |
| Fee Credit | $230.1M | 4% |
| Other | $201.5M | 4% |
| Fixed Annuity | $77.0M | 1% |
| Asset Management Segment | $56.9M | 1% |
| Monitoring Fee | $53.5M | 1% |
| Investment Advice | $40.6M | 1% |
| Fee Related Performance | $33.6M | 1% |
| Interest Sensitive Life | $21.7M | 0% |
| Incentive Fee | $11.0M | 0% |
